BAYLISS OUT

[Reg]

Has he been sacked yet?

Must be some kind of technical problem with the website, as I can't see the announcement of his dismissal.

[Muggy]

NOT YET

[Reg]

[Wintergreen]

Was it Bayles who got in a fight over a car parking space when he went to attend his Anger Management course or am I getting him mixed up with someone else?

[tictactoe]

John Little has hit the nail on the head, they won't get rid of Bayliss because he is probably owed a lot of money. Dire state for a football club to be in

[Barrowabc]

John Mackay was there and reading between the lines
He's backing Baylis

[DaveP]

Whatever happened after the match in no way justifies his language on the radio. If John McKay thinks it does then he should go as well.

Gross misconduct and a sackable offence in most jobs (and no compo).

We've been playing rubbish football since shezza left. Thats not the fans fault.

Gates have been falling away for the same period of time. Thats not the fans fault.

Bayliss loses the plot offers to fight the world and swears on radio. Whatever the provacation thats not the fans fault either.

He can't do the job, he can't manage players who clearly don't play for him just get rid now.

[barrowfan]

Was it Bayles who got in a fight over a car parking space when he went to attend his Anger Management course or am I getting him mixed up with someone else?

I seem to recall you are correct. http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/bayliss-i- ... ath=2.1998

If so, we have a manager who has already attended anger management therapy and goes on radio and says he will take on any fan that wants to fight him and he he will give them his address.

Nice!

[Barrow Bluebirds]

John Mackay was there and reading between the lines
He's backing Baylis

Also quoted as saying the Board may stick with Bayliss

[barrowfan]

John Mackay was there and reading between the lines
He's backing Baylis

You may be right in regard to the incident but IMO the much more serious matter was the way he brought the club into disrepute with his radio outburst.

The more I listen to it the worse it gets as he goes off on his foul-mouth rant and then says he has children himself. Bizarre.

[Ste Story]

“I felt the honourable thing to do was to leave because I felt I’d let the club down, I’d let myself down, I’d let my players and team-mates down, I’d let Shez down. I was at my lowest point. I was really devastated at what I’d done.

“But Tony being Tony, he got me help. I started getting counselling and that’s continuing.

“I’m not ashamed to admit that I did have problems, I still do have problems, and I’m working my way through them to get myself better."

[DaveP]

John Mackay was there and reading between the lines
He's backing Baylis

Also quoted as saying the Board may stick with Bayliss

If they do I hope the membership call an EGM and put forward a motion of no confidence in the BOD, I'm sure if they all resign or are kicked off one or two would step in at least temporarily to run the club.

this way the BOD who have put money in may well have to wave bye bye to it. Yes they can still chase the loans but they won't be in a power position to negotiate like they are now.

[Ste Story]

this way the BOD who have put money in may well have to wave bye bye to it. Yes they can still chase the loans but they won't be in a power position to negotiate like they are now.

I think it's fair to say they pretty much have the club over a barrel to do with as they please right now, through a number of reasons...

[Barrow Bluebirds]

Quoted from the Evening Mail

"Last week, before the Trinity clash, club chairman Brian Keen insisted that Bayliss's job is not currently on the line whilst also indicating his dissatisfaction at AFC's points total"

"And withouth pre-empting the investigation, MacKay indicated that there is no change to that stance"

What a joke of a club we have become.

[DaveP]

this way the BOD who have put money in may well have to wave bye bye to it. Yes they can still chase the loans but they won't be in a power position to negotiate like they are now.

I think it's fair to say they pretty much have the club over a barrel to do with as they please right now, through a number of reasons...

I know what you mean Ste but my point is that the membership can remove them at which point they become creditors and not individuals running the club and making decisions. Yes they can pursue their loans like any other creditor but are they really likely to liquidate the club and risk losing a lot of money especially when a sale proposal may be in the offing.

They act like they are untouchable but they can be removed at the behest of the membership just as easily as they were put there in the first place, perhaps they should be reminded of the fact they are acting on behalf of the membership. If we really believe they can do what they want and are unchallengeable you may as well change the constitution and give them the club right now.