Barrow AFC.net

boyliegladbach wrote:

Renfrew Refugee wrote:What is to stop them gaining entry into Holker Street for the remaining home games?

Will there be photos of the offenders at each turnstile?

Are they to report to the police station at 19:45 Tuesday & 15:00 for the other 2 home games?

How will it be policed???

As they were probably banned on the recommendation of the police I'm sure they will be looking out for them.

4 police in a crowd of 1200 they are going to have to be vigilant, unless they have photographic memories!!

I suppose our Stewards will be looking for them also, it's a shame they could not spot people smoking in the Wilkie Stand last Saturday.

Double edged sword for me this, Footy is an emotional game & over the top celebrations should not imo lead to bans, I'm sure this law was invented to protect the Players & Officials from any aggressive people from confronting them, This law is lax as it seems to be imposed differently as every season in Cup games or Promotion or escaping Relegation its acceptable, then other times it's not?

I have heard on the RC & seem in the mail where some sections of the away fans at Holker St encroached onto the pitch when they have scored, Have they all been ejected from the ground? If not why not? If Yes, Fair enough.

Holker St would be half empty if everyone who invaded the pitch at Lowie copped a ban, Common sense should prevail.

1st offense = Ejection & Warning that next time you'll miss the rest of the season.
2nd offense = Season Ban.
3rd offense Lifetime Ban.

Above all For happy pitch encroachment, All aggressive invaders automatically get a Lifetime Ban, no arguments.

At Lowestoft the stewards opened the gates so folk could get on the pitch more easily.

Wasn't the pitch encroachment at Chester after Barrow scored, whereas some of the other examples quoted above were after the game had finished?

I have to confess to my shame that I have invaded the pitch twice - once after the final whistle in an FA Cup tie at Chester in 1962, which we won against all expectations, and after the final whistle when we beat Brentord to win promotion in 1967. I don't think anyone can complain about being collared if they go onto the pitch before the final whistle.

Jim wrote:
I have to confess to my shame that I have invaded the pitch .... after the final whistle when we beat Brentford to win promotion in 1967.

You and the other 8,000+ of us!

Got to laugh at this 'Family club' nonsense they keep banging on about! Was it a family club when they were brushing Edmo's blatant and public sexist abuse aimed at a match official under the carpet? Or when a board member was caught fighting at an away game only to be 'spoken to' about their behaviour? No, it cant just be when it suits them!

police state!!!! they tryed to ban me from football forever but i blagged the judge hahahaha

When are they going to ban everyone that went to the playoff final and Lowestoft?

Why won't these so called 'supporters' finally get it into their heads that they MUST sit down and not show a peep of emotion. This is 2016 ffs! No noise in Football grounds.

It wasn't a board member that was fighting it was a volunteer.

Add that and the whole Edmo thing proves we are a proper family club.

Still awaiting an official statement with regards the Edmo sexism craic.

Tried hiding it didnt they?

KHayman wrote:It wasn't a board member that was fighting it was a volunteer.

Add that and the whole Edmo thing proves we are a proper family club.

Aye thats right, my mistake Kie, well in with the board though wernt they so it was forgotten about. Double standards everywhere

The best part was that one of these two tosspots was dumped on his backside by Tomlinson when he tried to celebrate with him.
If you can't control yourself enough to keep off the pitch while the game's going on, you're probably better off not being in a football ground.

And those goons saying "why arnt they banning every1 who went on the pitch at lowestoft?" - err...you mean when the stewards lined up on the pitch and let everyone come on and join in when the players were ready? That's standard practice, cretins jumping the barriers with unknown intentions isn't.

Moribund wrote:The best part was that one of these two tosspots was dumped on his backside by Tomlinson when he tried to celebrate with him.
If you can't control yourself enough to keep off the pitch while the game's going on, you're probably better off not being in a football ground.

And those goons saying "why arnt they banning every1 who went on the pitch at lowestoft?" - err...you mean when the stewards lined up on the pitch and let everyone come on and join in when the players were ready? That's standard practice, cretins jumping the barriers with unknown intentions isn't.

Still against the law.

patrickstarfish wrote:

Moribund wrote:The best part was that one of these two tosspots was dumped on his backside by Tomlinson when he tried to celebrate with him.
If you can't control yourself enough to keep off the pitch while the game's going on, you're probably better off not being in a football ground.

And those goons saying "why arnt they banning every1 who went on the pitch at lowestoft?" - err...you mean when the stewards lined up on the pitch and let everyone come on and join in when the players were ready? That's standard practice, cretins jumping the barriers with unknown intentions isn't.

Still against the law.

No it's not, you tool.
By your reasoning, everyone that takes a penalty at half-time should be receiving banning orders. Have a bloody think mate.

rite. do crime get caught no complaints about doing the time. risk they all take. should not be a crime though. common sense. if attacking ref or disrupt game then obvious ban. if celebrating goal then what is wrong. all i saw at chester was lads enjoying a day out.