Page 2 of 3

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 3:53 pm
by behind the goals
Scores for Bridge

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:07 pm
by Scott5
behind the goals wrote: ↑Sat Aug 29, 2026 3:53 pm Scores for Bridge
Bring him back πŸ˜‚

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:27 pm
by WalneyOne
behind the goals wrote: ↑Sat Aug 29, 2026 3:53 pm Scores for Bridge
Apparently they're playing him out of position...........as a striker 🀣

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:36 pm
by Wintergreen
Yep, he’s a good striker - withdrew his labour all last season.

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:40 pm
by WalneyOne
:skill
Wintergreen wrote: ↑Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:36 pm Yep, he’s a good striker - withdrew his labour all last season.
🀣🀣🀣

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2026 7:37 pm
by greenarmour
Played GaryπŸ‘

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
by jeff1966
WalneyOne wrote: ↑Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:43 pm That'll save the club pennies but every little helps...
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, don’t train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:04 am
by bluessupporter
jeff1966 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
WalneyOne wrote: ↑Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:43 pm That'll save the club pennies but every little helps...
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, don’t train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I thought when a player goes out on loan the other club pays a percentage of his wages. If that's the case we ARE saving some money.

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:08 am
by WalneyOne
bluessupporter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:04 am
jeff1966 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am

Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, don’t train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I thought when a player goes out on loan the other club pays a percentage of his wages. If that's the case we ARE saving some money.
They can't be chipping in more than a couple of hundred a week surely, but every little helps!

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:41 am
by bluessupporter
WalneyOne wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:08 am
bluessupporter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:04 am

I thought when a player goes out on loan the other club pays a percentage of his wages. If that's the case we ARE saving some money.
They can't be chipping in more than a couple of hundred a week surely, but every little helps!
And if the rumours are true it gets rid of one of the players producing negative vibes.

Let's hope he enjoys another club.

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:21 am
by WalneyOne
bluessupporter wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:41 am
WalneyOne wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:08 am

They can't be chipping in more than a couple of hundred a week surely, but every little helps!
And if the rumours are true it gets rid of one of the players producing negative vibes.

Let's hope he enjoys another club.
Or maybe he was just telling the truth, that last season as a club we were a car crash and no one wanted to listen.

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:46 am
by blue nige
jeff1966 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
WalneyOne wrote: ↑Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:43 pm That'll save the club pennies but every little helps...
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, don’t train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I have been told HE HASN'T refused to train he was excluded this has come from two people I really trust and the person who wanted him excluded wasn't Murray as the saying goes you do the maths! πŸ˜€

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:09 pm
by WalneyOne
blue nige wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:46 am
jeff1966 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am

Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, don’t train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I have been told HE HASN'T refused to train he was excluded this has come from two people I really trust and the person who wanted him excluded wasn't Murray as the saying goes you do the maths! πŸ˜€
I was shot down for posting after the Workington game that the decision Barkhuizen was surplus was not Murrays as he hadn't even seen him train.This seems to confirm my thoughts at that time, namely it was made from within the clubs hierarchy.

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:21 pm
by Main Stand SeasonTct
WalneyOne wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:09 pm
blue nige wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:46 am

I have been told HE HASN'T refused to train he was excluded this has come from two people I really trust and the person who wanted him excluded wasn't Murray as the saying goes you do the maths! πŸ˜€
I was shot down for posting after the Workington game that the decision Barkhuizen was surplus was not Murrays as he hadn't even seen him train.This seems to confirm my thoughts at that time, namely it was made from within the clubs hierarchy.
I’m led to believe he spoke disparagingly about the club last season and this got back to the directors who were very unhappy about it hence he was frozen out towards the end of last season and this season too.

Re: Barkhuizen

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:23 pm
by WalneyOne
Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:21 pm
WalneyOne wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:09 pm
I was shot down for posting after the Workington game that the decision Barkhuizen was surplus was not Murrays as he hadn't even seen him train.This seems to confirm my thoughts at that time, namely it was made from within the clubs hierarchy.
I’m led to believe he spoke disparagingly about the club last season and this got back to the directors who were very unhappy about it hence he was frozen out towards the end of last season and this season too.
Spoke disparagingly as in saying it was a car crash?