Page 2 of 3
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 3:53 pm
by behind the goals
Scores for Bridge
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:07 pm
by Scott5
Bring him back

Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:27 pm
by WalneyOne
Apparently they're playing him out of position...........as a striker

Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:36 pm
by Wintergreen
Yep, heβs a good striker - withdrew his labour all last season.
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2026 4:40 pm
by WalneyOne
:skill
Wintergreen wrote: βSat Aug 29, 2026 4:36 pm
Yep, heβs a good striker - withdrew his labour all last season.



Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2026 7:37 pm
by greenarmour
Played Gary

Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
by jeff1966
WalneyOne wrote: βFri Aug 28, 2026 7:43 pm
That'll save the club pennies but every little helps...
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, donβt train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:04 am
by bluessupporter
jeff1966 wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
WalneyOne wrote: βFri Aug 28, 2026 7:43 pm
That'll save the club pennies but every little helps...
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, donβt train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I thought when a player goes out on loan the other club pays a percentage of his wages. If that's the case we ARE saving some money.
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:08 am
by WalneyOne
bluessupporter wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 10:04 am
jeff1966 wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, donβt train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I thought when a player goes out on loan the other club pays a percentage of his wages. If that's the case we ARE saving some money.
They can't be chipping in more than a couple of hundred a week surely, but every little helps!
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:41 am
by bluessupporter
WalneyOne wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 10:08 am
bluessupporter wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 10:04 am
I thought when a player goes out on loan the other club pays a percentage of his wages. If that's the case we ARE saving some money.
They can't be chipping in more than a couple of hundred a week surely, but every little helps!
And if the rumours are true it gets rid of one of the players producing negative vibes.
Let's hope he enjoys another club.
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:21 am
by WalneyOne
bluessupporter wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 10:41 am
WalneyOne wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 10:08 am
They can't be chipping in more than a couple of hundred a week surely, but every little helps!
And if the rumours are true it gets rid of one of the players producing negative vibes.
Let's hope he enjoys another club.
Or maybe he was just telling the truth, that last season as a club we were a car crash and no one wanted to listen.
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:46 am
by blue nige
jeff1966 wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
WalneyOne wrote: βFri Aug 28, 2026 7:43 pm
That'll save the club pennies but every little helps...
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, donβt train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I have been told HE HASN'T refused to train he was excluded this has come from two people I really trust and the person who wanted him excluded wasn't Murray as the saying goes you do the maths!

Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:09 pm
by WalneyOne
blue nige wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 11:46 am
jeff1966 wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 8:58 am
Saves the club nothing. Only one winner and that Barkhuizen. Full wage, donβt train and have a kick about on a Saturday. Absolute car crash of a situation from our point of view
I have been told HE HASN'T refused to train he was excluded this has come from two people I really trust and the person who wanted him excluded wasn't Murray as the saying goes you do the maths!
I was shot down for posting after the Workington game that the decision Barkhuizen was surplus was not Murrays as he hadn't even seen him train.This seems to confirm my thoughts at that time, namely it was made from within the clubs hierarchy.
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:21 pm
by Main Stand SeasonTct
WalneyOne wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 12:09 pm
blue nige wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 11:46 am
I have been told HE HASN'T refused to train he was excluded this has come from two people I really trust and the person who wanted him excluded wasn't Murray as the saying goes you do the maths!
I was shot down for posting after the Workington game that the decision Barkhuizen was surplus was not Murrays as he hadn't even seen him train.This seems to confirm my thoughts at that time, namely it was made from within the clubs hierarchy.
Iβm led to believe he spoke disparagingly about the club last season and this got back to the directors who were very unhappy about it hence he was frozen out towards the end of last season and this season too.
Re: Barkhuizen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 12:23 pm
by WalneyOne
Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 12:21 pm
WalneyOne wrote: βFri Sep 04, 2026 12:09 pm
I was shot down for posting after the Workington game that the decision Barkhuizen was surplus was not Murrays as he hadn't even seen him train.This seems to confirm my thoughts at that time, namely it was made from within the clubs hierarchy.
Iβm led to believe he spoke disparagingly about the club last season and this got back to the directors who were very unhappy about it hence he was frozen out towards the end of last season and this season too.
Spoke disparagingly as in saying it was a car crash?