Page 18 of 19
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:22 pm
by Shaun
We're not getting tanked by anyone are we. So sorting our [SwearFilter] attack out has to be the main priority.
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:41 pm
by blue nige
Shaun wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:22 pm
We're not getting tanked by anyone are we. So sorting our [SwearFilter] attack out has to be the main priority.
Yes everyone will remember that when we get relegated!
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:42 pm
by Shaun
It's October mate.
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:00 pm
by blue nige
Shaun wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:42 pm
It's October mate.
Look at the table!
You have also stated you don't even watch them so what are you basing your views on?
Oh and by the way I'm not your F*****g mate!
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:07 pm
by michaelstreet75
For someone who hasn't watched us this season shaun, I'd like to know where your optimisem comes from? As long as mickey moore remains in charge it'll be a lot longer than 2 games until we get another 4 points, the guys completely useles
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:19 pm
by spirit of 1990
I think I'm right in saying Shaun now lives abroad, that doesn't (and shouldn't) stop him having an opinion on his club. I suppose for a lot of exiles reading this forum is their main way of keeping up to date on things.
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:23 pm
by michaelstreet75
It wasn't a dig at shaun or anyone else, just as someone who has seen majority of home games this year, I have no optimisum left currently!
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm
by JammyBluebird
Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:21 pm
by Thelandlord
JammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm
Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
Would have been a plum tie that
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:22 pm
by boyliegladbach
JammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm
Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
Here we go. Might not have been
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:28 pm
by JammyBluebird
boyliegladbach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:22 pm
JammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm
Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
Here we go. Might not have been
Why not? Balls were allocated to each tie so it would have been...
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:31 pm
by daltonbellringer
barrow would have been a different number to shaw lane so maybe we wouldnt have got mansfield
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:32 pm
by JammyBluebird
daltonbellringer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:31 pm
barrow would have been a different number to shaw lane so maybe we wouldnt have got mansfield
The balls were allocated ties prior to the matches being played so we would have always been 52.
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:35 pm
by olbarrafancumbak
Or as jim bowan uaed to say "look at what you could have won"
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:36 pm
by boyliegladbach
JammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:28 pm
boyliegladbach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:22 pm
Here we go. Might not have been
Why not? Balls were allocated to each tie so it would have been...
https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect
For example if it takes less time to say barrow than it does shaw lane then person drawing the second teams hand,would enter a split second later meaning the balls may have been in a slightly different position.