Barrow v Accrington Stanley, match thread

For all things Barrow AFC. Keep discussions civil and fair, we're all Barrow aren't we!
Arvo
Gold Member
Posts: 1775
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Barrow v Accrington Stanley, match thread

Post by Arvo » Sun Mar 15, 2026 11:33 pm

Pedro wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2026 1:59 pm Yesterday was a start and could have got beat with the shot that hit our player and went to a player.in a offside position who scored .
Pre Foley days the referee would not have given offside
As Shakespeare may (or more likely not) have said:
“I don’t know, it was pretty clear.
He was so far offside, he was in Korea.”

That said, it was at least something that the obligatory added time equaliser/winner turned out not to be an obligatory added time equaliser/winner after all.
No bubblewrap unpopped.

User avatar
Steeley
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5750
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Re: Barrow v Accrington Stanley, match thread

Post by Steeley » Mon Mar 16, 2026 8:42 am

Arvo wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2026 11:33 pm
Pedro wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2026 1:59 pm Yesterday was a start and could have got beat with the shot that hit our player and went to a player.in a offside position who scored .
Pre Foley days the referee would not have given offside
As Shakespeare may (or more likely not) have said:
“I don’t know, it was pretty clear.
He was so far offside, he was in Korea.”

That said, it was at least something that the obligatory added time equaliser/winner turned out not to be an obligatory added time equaliser/winner after all.
As much as we are poor and you make your own luck, how that ended up at maddens feet wouldn’t happen again in a thousand efforts, add to that the other “unlucky” goals fleetwood winner and gillingham winner we could’ve so easily been a few points better off.
Bish=God

User avatar
McMark
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 11408
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Barrow v Accrington Stanley, match thread

Post by McMark » Mon Mar 16, 2026 1:52 pm

Arvo wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2026 11:33 pm
Pedro wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2026 1:59 pm Yesterday was a start and could have got beat with the shot that hit our player and went to a player.in a offside position who scored .
Pre Foley days the referee would not have given offside
As Shakespeare may (or more likely not) have said:
“I don’t know, it was pretty clear.
He was so far offside, he was in Korea.”

That said, it was at least something that the obligatory added time equaliser/winner turned out not to be an obligatory added time equaliser/winner after all.
So long as the end result is we stay in the league cometh season end. Then it can be as you like it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests