The unofficial Barrow AFC fans forum
https://www.barrowafc.net/
Same reason Stockport got rid of him.HenneysKnee wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:48 pm He probably should be, but as others have pointed out elsewhere it’s where you play him. He doesn’t really have a position in our system
He offers more than Aqua !HenneysKnee wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:48 pm He probably should be, but as others have pointed out elsewhere it’s where you play him. He doesn’t really have a position in our system
my opinion tooBigfathoss wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 10:07 pm For my money, Whits is the best and most promising player on our books.
Disagree although he does offer more than Telford, Stockton or Proctor as a striker even though he's an out-an-out right winger.blue nige wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 10:04 pmHe offers more than Aqua !HenneysKnee wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:48 pm He probably should be, but as others have pointed out elsewhere it’s where you play him. He doesn’t really have a position in our system
We can do without these players in my opinion. None of them has made much of an impression on me except for Proctor and in his case not for the right reasons.behind the goals wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:57 pm The following players are on +1 season options Proctor, Duffus, Bray, Reeve, Etaluku, & Bellis don't know who decides who stays the Club or maybe the player.
The only one of those six who 'could' have made an impression on anybody is Proctor. Duffus confidence took a knock when a Stockport defender tried to launch his head out of the ground. He went to hartlepool and was doing ok when he picked up an injury unfortunately just at a time when they were bringing in 3-4 new faces who established themselves during his absence. The other four are 'B' team players whom many won't have seen play at all. Etaluku seems to have got good reports from the games he's played and Bellis has certainly done himself no harm aiding Kiddys relegation fight. The other two haven't stamped any authority but to be fair their games have been very few and far between . If we were in mid-table obscurity and safe then I'm sure Pete would have been giving them chance to prove themselves, but I would repeat its difficult to impress if you're not playing.Wintergreen wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:17 amWe can do without these players in my opinion. None of them has made much of an impression on me except for Proctor and in his case not for the right reasons.behind the goals wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:57 pm The following players are on +1 season options Proctor, Duffus, Bray, Reeve, Etaluku, & Bellis don't know who decides who stays the Club or maybe the player.
Think that’s an excellent analysis.Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:42 am Ben Whitfield signed for Barrow from Stockport as he never fitted into Stockport's system at the time that being 3 centre halves and two wingbacks. Pete Wild signed him as an out and out winger and played him that way with a flat back 4. Around xmas time Wild changed to 3 centre halves and 2 wingbacks and has continued with that system ever since. The problem for Ben is that defensively playing at wingback he is not that good. . He was massively exposed against Colchester when they brought Fevrier on so much so Wild brought Mazeed on and put Ben up front.
With Newby being two footed he has something extra at wingback that Whitfield does not possess. Whits likes to cut inside where as Newby can go either way. and defensively he has improved.
Whits has been tried up front but for me he goes missing for long spells of the game when playing in that position.
He is an out and out winger IMO playing in a side with a flat back 4 but we don't play that system now so as a consequence he has found himself on the bench and being used as an impact player late in the game. I don't see Pete Wild changing the system anytime soon and I suspect Whitfield will depart in the summer looking for regular game time elsewhere.