17/18 FAC - Shaw Lane 2 - 1 Barrow
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
We're not getting tanked by anyone are we. So sorting our [SwearFilter] attack out has to be the main priority.
"Walter, I'm sure there's a reason you brought your dirty undies..."
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
It's October mate.
"Walter, I'm sure there's a reason you brought your dirty undies..."
-
michaelstreet75
- Member
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:06 am
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
For someone who hasn't watched us this season shaun, I'd like to know where your optimisem comes from? As long as mickey moore remains in charge it'll be a lot longer than 2 games until we get another 4 points, the guys completely useles
- spirit of 1990
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 9876
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:50 am
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
I think I'm right in saying Shaun now lives abroad, that doesn't (and shouldn't) stop him having an opinion on his club. I suppose for a lot of exiles reading this forum is their main way of keeping up to date on things.
We didn't underestimate them, we just didn't think they were that good.
-
michaelstreet75
- Member
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:06 am
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
It wasn't a dig at shaun or anyone else, just as someone who has seen majority of home games this year, I have no optimisum left currently!
-
JammyBluebird
- Silver Member
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:57 pm
- Location: Barrow
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
- Thelandlord
- Senior Member
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
JammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
Would have been a plum tie that
-
boyliegladbach
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 8713
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
- Location: Tel aviv
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Here we go. Might not have beenJammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
-
JammyBluebird
- Silver Member
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:57 pm
- Location: Barrow
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Why not? Balls were allocated to each tie so it would have been...boyliegladbach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:22 pmHere we go. Might not have beenJammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
-
daltonbellringer
- Member
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
barrow would have been a different number to shaw lane so maybe we wouldnt have got mansfield
-
JammyBluebird
- Silver Member
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:57 pm
- Location: Barrow
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
The balls were allocated ties prior to the matches being played so we would have always been 52.daltonbellringer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:31 pm barrow would have been a different number to shaw lane so maybe we wouldnt have got mansfield
-
olbarrafancumbak
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
Or as jim bowan uaed to say "look at what you could have won"
-
boyliegladbach
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 8713
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
- Location: Tel aviv
- Contact:
Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread
https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effectJammyBluebird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:28 pmWhy not? Balls were allocated to each tie so it would have been...
For example if it takes less time to say barrow than it does shaw lane then person drawing the second teams hand,would enter a split second later meaning the balls may have been in a slightly different position.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest