17/18 FAC - Shaw Lane 2 - 1 Barrow

A forum for previous match threads.
Shaun
Gold Member
Posts: 2085
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 12:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by Shaun » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:22 pm

We're not getting tanked by anyone are we. So sorting our [SwearFilter] attack out has to be the main priority.
"Walter, I'm sure there's a reason you brought your dirty undies..."

blue nige
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 6922
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:21 pm
Location: Antarctica
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by blue nige » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:41 pm

Shaun wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:22 pm We're not getting tanked by anyone are we. So sorting our [SwearFilter] attack out has to be the main priority.
Yes everyone will remember that when we get relegated!

Shaun
Gold Member
Posts: 2085
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 12:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by Shaun » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:42 pm

It's October mate.
"Walter, I'm sure there's a reason you brought your dirty undies..."

blue nige
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 6922
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:21 pm
Location: Antarctica
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by blue nige » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:00 pm

Shaun wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:42 pm It's October mate.
Look at the table!
You have also stated you don't even watch them so what are you basing your views on?
Oh and by the way I'm not your F*****g mate! :roll:

michaelstreet75
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by michaelstreet75 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:07 pm

For someone who hasn't watched us this season shaun, I'd like to know where your optimisem comes from? As long as mickey moore remains in charge it'll be a lot longer than 2 games until we get another 4 points, the guys completely useles

User avatar
spirit of 1990
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 9876
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by spirit of 1990 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:19 pm

I think I'm right in saying Shaun now lives abroad, that doesn't (and shouldn't) stop him having an opinion on his club. I suppose for a lot of exiles reading this forum is their main way of keeping up to date on things.
We didn't underestimate them, we just didn't think they were that good.

michaelstreet75
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by michaelstreet75 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:23 pm

It wasn't a dig at shaun or anyone else, just as someone who has seen majority of home games this year, I have no optimisum left currently!

JammyBluebird
Silver Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:57 pm
Location: Barrow
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by JammyBluebird » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm

Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through

User avatar
Thelandlord
Senior Member
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by Thelandlord » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:21 pm

JammyBluebird wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through

Would have been a plum tie that

boyliegladbach
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8713
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Tel aviv
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by boyliegladbach » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:22 pm

JammyBluebird wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
Here we go. Might not have been

JammyBluebird
Silver Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:57 pm
Location: Barrow
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by JammyBluebird » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:28 pm

boyliegladbach wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:22 pm
JammyBluebird wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:20 pm Would have been a home tie vs Mansfield if we got through
Here we go. Might not have been
Why not? Balls were allocated to each tie so it would have been...

daltonbellringer
Member
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by daltonbellringer » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:31 pm

barrow would have been a different number to shaw lane so maybe we wouldnt have got mansfield

JammyBluebird
Silver Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:57 pm
Location: Barrow
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by JammyBluebird » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:32 pm

daltonbellringer wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:31 pm barrow would have been a different number to shaw lane so maybe we wouldnt have got mansfield
The balls were allocated ties prior to the matches being played so we would have always been 52.

olbarrafancumbak
Gold Member
Posts: 2411
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by olbarrafancumbak » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:35 pm

Or as jim bowan uaed to say "look at what you could have won"

boyliegladbach
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8713
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Tel aviv
Contact:

Re: Shaw Lane v Barrow Match Thread

Post by boyliegladbach » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:36 pm

JammyBluebird wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:28 pm
boyliegladbach wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:22 pm

Here we go. Might not have been
Why not? Balls were allocated to each tie so it would have been...
https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

For example if it takes less time to say barrow than it does shaw lane then person drawing the second teams hand,would enter a split second later meaning the balls may have been in a slightly different position.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest