Scott Quigley

For all things Barrow AFC. Keep discussions civil and fair, we're all Barrow aren't we!
User avatar
chipmunx
Gold Member
Posts: 2290
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Fortress Holker Street
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by chipmunx » Sat Jul 17, 2021 12:39 pm

John_Bucks wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 10:45 am Lot of people on here either psychic or just spouting hot air. How do you know it doesn’t suit his home life better? How do you know the trauma of losing a close family member hasn’t prompted this move??

Lot of pompous know-it-all’s on here who just can’t wait to tear someone down cause they dare to leave. Someone who was very good for us. Just plain spiteful.
Scott lives in Oswestry - literally 15-20 miles from Wrexham. Wrexham put a bid in and were very interested in signing him, yet he's gone to a club where his travelling through the week for training is much further away - and the same as it was if he's stayed with us. However it's dressed up money was a major factor.
Yes he also did a very good job for us and nobody can fault his desire to do well for us and his interview after the Morecambe game was the kick start that helped us stay up.
Lancashire;- born and bred

Hadrian
Platinum Member
Posts: 4751
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by Hadrian » Sat Jul 17, 2021 2:08 pm

Could you clarify where the latest new training facility is?

Like Rooney, he will be reducing his Friday nights away by 60% or more.
THE NORTHERN WAY

RedWeb
Veteran Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:57 am
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by RedWeb » Sat Jul 17, 2021 3:08 pm

Hadrian wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 2:08 pm Like Rooney, he will be reducing his Friday nights away by 60% or more.
Any aspiring professional footballer who prioritises Friday nights at home will never get signed by a league club. However, Quiggs is 30 next year so is entering the back end of his career. No problem with him prioritising cash over league football, same goes with Rooney.

kikka
Member
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by kikka » Sat Jul 17, 2021 4:10 pm

Definitely time to put this story to bed now and look to the future ... ( although if anyone can tell us how much we got for him eventually it would be interesting ).

He was strong and direct , turned well ...and was often admired by other clubs for these qualities ...but his scoring record in League Two and above was never great ...and while he sometimes showed surprisingly deft touches .... he was too prone to looking for the free kick , and referees were well aware of this . He may also be at an age where his pace begins to trail off . We need a pacy replacement with an eye for goal , for sure and I hope people are right when they say that it is likely that the manager and board will have been looking around with that in mind for at least a few weeks now .

Given the number of ex-league clubs now in The National League ... it is by no means guaranteed that Stockport will go up even with him in their ranks ... and despite their 'big wage' policy ... and, if that comes to pass, I will struggle to hide a smile.

:scarf:
First match : Barrow v Northampton Town : Sat. 24th Sept. 1960 ... won 1-0... ( which was nice )

Richard Ingham
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5116
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Chorley
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by Richard Ingham » Sat Jul 17, 2021 5:12 pm

Hadrian wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 2:08 pm Could you clarify where the latest new training facility is?
Here I believe, Goshen Sports Centre, Tennyson Ave, Bury BL9 9RG

Possibly where the old Bury club trained before they moved to City's old facilities at Carrington and didnt pay their way.

Looking on Satellite view, we better hope the River Roch doesnt flood in the winter.

User avatar
chipmunx
Gold Member
Posts: 2290
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Fortress Holker Street
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by chipmunx » Sat Jul 17, 2021 5:24 pm

Richard Ingham wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 5:12 pm
Hadrian wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 2:08 pm Could you clarify where the latest new training facility is?
Here I believe, Goshen Sports Centre, Tennyson Ave, Bury BL9 9RG

Possibly where the old Bury club trained before they moved to City's old facilities at Carrington and didnt pay their way.

Looking on Satellite view, we better hope the River Roch doesnt flood in the winter.
yep the new facilities are in Bury - whilst Stockport train at Carrington - so no difference at all hardly for Quigley there.
Lancashire;- born and bred

Hadrian
Platinum Member
Posts: 4751
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by Hadrian » Sat Jul 17, 2021 9:48 pm

An hour per training day - hardly 'hardly no difference'.
THE NORTHERN WAY

Hadrian
Platinum Member
Posts: 4751
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by Hadrian » Sat Jul 17, 2021 9:49 pm

Richard Ingham wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 5:12 pm
Hadrian wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 2:08 pm Could you clarify where the latest new training facility is?
Here I believe, Goshen Sports Centre, Tennyson Ave, Bury BL9 9RG

Possibly where the old Bury club trained before they moved to City's old facilities at Carrington and didnt pay their way.

Looking on Satellite view, we better hope the River Roch doesnt flood in the winter.
Thank you
THE NORTHERN WAY

Hadrian
Platinum Member
Posts: 4751
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by Hadrian » Sat Jul 17, 2021 9:51 pm

RedWeb wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 3:08 pm Any aspiring professional footballer who prioritises Friday nights at home will never get signed by a league club.
Hardly 'aspiring' at his age.

He has, of course, left a league club to sign for another that isn't.
THE NORTHERN WAY

RedWeb
Veteran Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:57 am
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by RedWeb » Sun Jul 18, 2021 10:03 am

Hadrian wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 9:51 pm Hardly 'aspiring' at his age.
Hence the sentence that followed.

signalman 65
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 6:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by signalman 65 » Sun Jul 18, 2021 1:43 pm

kikka wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 4:10 pm Definitely time to put this story to bed now and look to the future ... ( although if anyone can tell us how much we got for him eventually it would be
According to the None League Newspaper the fee is reputed to be circa £150,000

NORTHERNSOUL
Senior Member
Posts: 297
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:47 am
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by NORTHERNSOUL » Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:21 am

Desmond2-2 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:59 am I agree to a point, but if another club comes offering more money and the player has no loyalty to the club, what in all honesty can you do.
What you can do is say Scott we appreciate your situation and are quite willing to release you from your contract so long as either you or your shyster mate Whiston can find a club willing to pay us 500k upfront.

And talk about refusing to train and play are concerned given what was already public his only way of doing that [ by persuading his GP to give him a sick note ] would have been very difficult as it is pretty certain that in the player's contract will be a clause that entitles the club to have a specialist in whatever he was claiming was wrong with him examine him and if he provided a report saying he disagreed with the GP.s assessment then at the next renewal of the " sick note " to sign him off again the GP would have to go against the consultant's opinion and in the world of medicine that's not how it's done.

Accrington had this problem with Billy Kee although slightly different in that nobody thought that he didn't have issues or that BK was trying to engineer a move He just wanted out as he couldn't take the pressure anymore but doing that meant AS would lose a major value asset. As I understood it they assisted him to get for lack of a better word " certified " which meant they were able to claim insurance wise. In return, he can't change his mind and play at any level higher than he is now without his new club repaying the insurance company what they paid out.

I.m not sure i.d of played it the way Hornby has I think i.d of tested him first knowing that he simply couldn't have refused to play and train I believe [ if he openly did that without being " signed off " ] a club can stop a player's wages after 2 weeks and then you come to what happens a year down the line when his contract expires if he's stayed away and you.ve not paid him for a year what's to stop you offering him a new contract at a pound a week more which means [ even tho he.s out of contract ] you can refuse to release his playing registration meaning his career and earnings are at a stop.

My Guess is Hornby will have accepted a fee that gives them as much as they could get without getting into legal and tribunals the cost of which could very quickly reach 100k so I reckon he.ll have wanted 250 but settled for the 150k release fee as has been mentioned to avoid the hassle and the outside possibility that he could end up with a victory but having spent the 250k to get it.

But now we come to Stockport and their undisclosed fee scam if what they actually paid for Maddern was to be the highest fee they've ever paid for a player who do they list as their record signing without either divulging it or lying to all and sundry ?

And to finish I really don't want to [SwearFilter] on your parade but i.ve seen Zanzala play for 3 different clubs over I think its 6 years and if I was a scout doing my homework on him my conclusion would be not to touch him with a barge pole the phrase I think is " flatters " to deceive and with the service, he got at both Accy and Carlisle he should have scored twice the goals that he did. And please don't believe you got him for any reason other than the following its pretty sure that players at the end of their contracts at Carlisle are now placed into one of three groups Group A Definitely want to re sign so happy to offer a rise in wages from the misery amount that they no doubt originally signed for. Group B Happy to keep them if they're stupid enough to sign again for the misery sum they did before. Group C Want to get rid of for whatever reason Offer them no increase on the original wage which will have been totally crap in the first place. Bennet is the perfect example signed for next to nothing to get back playing again with a manager he knew wouldn't take the [SwearFilter] out of him and who he would know couldn't pay any more than they offered him. No doubt Beech promised them the earth when it came round to a new contract but what he didn't do was explain to them what Holdsworth's role would be. And guess what it all ended up in tears and acrimony with the player making his offer public and DH telling him where to go.

I genuinely hope you find someone to replace Quigley and not rely on Zanzala and that you have a season to remember in the League in front of your own fans at last.

barrow-mike
Senior Member
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 6:42 pm
Location: barrow

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by barrow-mike » Thu Jul 22, 2021 7:48 am

What's all the fuss about Scott Quigley. Hes gone ...end off !!

User avatar
Jim
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 7262
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by Jim » Thu Jul 22, 2021 8:38 am

barrow-mike wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 7:48 am What's all the fuss about Scott Quigley. Hes gone ...end off !!
Like Brexit, Coronavirus and Rooney, a topic that won't go away.

HenneysKnee
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8339
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Scott Quigley

Post by HenneysKnee » Thu Jul 22, 2021 9:39 am

NORTHERNSOUL wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:21 am
Desmond2-2 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:59 am I agree to a point, but if another club comes offering more money and the player has no loyalty to the club, what in all honesty can you do.
My Guess is Hornby will have accepted a fee that gives them as much as they could get without getting into legal and tribunals the cost of which could very quickly reach 100k so I reckon he.ll have wanted 250 but settled for the 150k release fee as has been mentioned to avoid the hassle and the outside possibility that he could end up with a victory but having spent the 250k to get it.
If there was a £150k release fee (and I’ve no idea if that’s true) then Hornby could want £250k all he wants but clubs would be daft to offer it. Steve Whiston will have let the interested clubs know exactly how much they had to offer; and if Stockport had budgeted £250k for Quigs (I very much doubt that) it means they’d have plenty left over for a healthy signing on fee……a cut of which would go to the agent

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 14 guests