Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 8:13 pm
Esso blue you make good points but the thing to remember is Rushden had no history an area with clubs already well established plus the groud was in the middle of nowhere.
The unofficial Barrow AFC fans forum
https://www.barrowafc.net/
Esso Blue, the points you make are valid; in the recent unveiling of future plans by PC one of the striking things he mentioned was that he wanted the future facility to be a 7 day a week operation, for conferences, weddings, hospitality etc etc so it would seem that our owner is very well aware that it needs to be an almost permanently functional venue.Esso Blue wrote:This and the Darlington stories are very sad. They illustrate how it's not enough simply to spend lots of money to create a new football stadium. You have to have a plan for that stadium to generate funds outside of football otherwise the maintenance, utilities and rates become a drain on the football funds. My wife used to work for Dr. Martens and I went to Nene Park on several occasions, including as a supporter of the away team![]()
Guesstimates were that Max Griggs had ploughed about £20M into R&D and I can see how that could have been easily possible. They had a great ride for a few years. I'd rather we spend less money and have a ground that can generate sufficent imcome to cover its running costs, allowing the football operations to be used to develop and grow the football side. If the ground can generate a bit of a surplus then even better but that would be a bonus.
My observation is that the Furness area is badly lacking in conference, meeting and training venues. I know business colleagues who have really struggled to find good venues in the area. Include these in the ground and they can then be used for corporate hospitality on match days (a la Crossbar but more modern and flexible in configuration). I'm optimistic that PC recognises this and won't get sucked into creating a multi-million pound retail development opportunity.
The number of ugly temporary scaffolding constructions we have had around the ground over the years to support cameras from one visit of the BBC to the couple of seasons of Setanta TV. Looks ugly, costs (someone) money and reduces spectator space. When we were at Burton in the play-off final it struck me how the ground was set up for TV, IIRC it even had a built in platform behind one of the goals, the Barrow end? If Mr Casson has any sense, making the ground easily accessible for TV cameras is a good idea. For any side with League aspirations it is a must.Steelworks End wrote:I do hope that the ground redevelopment plans include a proper television gantry, both for possible future media coverage of matches but also for our own use. Good though Matthew Dodd's match highlight clips are, they are let down through no fault of his own by various heads appearing at inopportune moments. And that supporting column in the middle of the stand is a continuing hindrance to recording a match.
That would be Mr. V, then?K_BFC wrote: Who ever had our current main stand built had no idea.
If you go on their website, Barrow are mentioned as one of the non-league clubs they're associated with. Presumably they're one of the 4Jonty wrote:Noted FWP (Frank Whittle Partners) are linked as a partner of AFC Fylde, so I presume they are behind the design for that ground. They were linked to us for the redevelopment a couple seasons ago.
We've been named on their website since the "proposed redevelopment" a few years ago. They could well be involved in the new talks given their main business is redeveloping football grounds, and that four firms are in talks, but I wouldn't presume anything. Given FWP did the modern looking Fleetwood curve, are proposing a very similar thing for AFC Fylde, and that PC has already stated he wants a traditional looking redevelopment, I wouldn't be putting my money on them being chosen as the final architect.Paul wrote:If you go on their website, Barrow are mentioned as one of the non-league clubs they're associated with. Presumably they're one of the 4Jonty wrote:Noted FWP (Frank Whittle Partners) are linked as a partner of AFC Fylde, so I presume they are behind the design for that ground. They were linked to us for the redevelopment a couple seasons ago.
architects firms Casson has dealt with recently.
Does Archibald Leitch still have a company on the go?Richard Ingham wrote: PC has already stated he wants a traditional looking redevelopment, I wouldn't be putting my money on them being chosen as the final architect.
Yes they were.bluebird90 wrote:Didn't Fylde used to be Kirkham and Wesham?